Rashida Tlaib's Evolving Definition of Whiteness

As the media floods the landscape with analogies of Trump as Hitler:

CNN: Trump Parrots Hitler

CNBC: Trump Parrots Hitler

Axios: Trump Echoes Hitler

Reuters: Trump Repeats Hitler

Washington Post: Trump Echoes Hitler

Rolling Stone: Trump Evokes Hitler

NBC News: Trump Likened to Hitler

ABC News: Trump Channeled Hitler

Yahoo! News: Trump Echoes Hitler

Daily Beast: Trump Channeled Hitler

What was the line that Trump used that set off the sirens?

"Poisoning the Blood of Our Country."

Now we sane Americans all agree that Hitler is bad. Killed millions of people.

But when Hitler used that line, who specifically was he talking about? It is a very important delineation to make in today's climate. Hitler was talking about Immigrants and Jews.

Trump was referencing Immigrants at the Mexican Border.

There is an American who is specifically targeting the Jews and that's Representative Rashida Tlaib. Somehow her words aren't splashed across the front pages of American Newspapers because she is attacking the Jews in a very unique way.

Hitler was trying to keep the Aryans "pure."

Representative Rashida Tlaib has repeatedly tried to re-frame the Jews as "White." Why is that important? I am going to take a screen shot in case the blurb disappears. This is on a U.S. Government Website:

She keeps using the term Apartheid. That is not what's going on in Israel. I want you to read that statement very, very closely. Does she say Israel has a right to exist? She does not. She says Israelis have a right to exist, just like the Palestinians. Does she mean Israelis have the right to exist under a majority Palestinian regime or under today's borders? Ah-

Why are we splitting hairs? Because APARTHEID is a very specific term. It is when a minority White population rules over the majority Black population.

There is a simple resolution in the Middle East and that's the Two-State Solution. But for the past 50 years, this is how the negotiations have gone:

Israel: You get a country when you say we have a right to exist.

Palestinians: Die, Jew, Die.

Since violent chants didn't work, now Tlaib and the Palestinians are now selling you that the minority, light-skinned Jewish population are oppressing the majority, dark-skinned Palestinians.

This is wrong on a number of levels.

1. Inside the actual borders of Israel, the Jews are the majority. Majority ruled by the Majority.

2. Inside the actual borders of Palestine, the Palestinians are the Majority. In South Africa, there were no "occupied territories." During Apartheid, did the Black parts of South Africa shoot missiles into the White areas of South Africa? Were Black South Africans given million dollar weaponry from other Black African nations? That never happened. Israel occupies Palestine because they continued, year after year, to shoot missiles into Israel proper. Israel declared war on Gaza after the October 7th attacks. Everything since October 7th, fair or foul, is a war action.

3. If I stood an average Israeli next to the average Palestinian in similar garb, you know what you'd notice? That their skin color is remarkably similar. Apartheid, by definition, is based off of skin color. What is happening in Israel is based off of religion or culture.

A very disturbing undertone is being propagated by the far-left. When Palestinians chant "from the river to the sea," you know what that means? It means kill Jews.

Where are the Tlaib parrots Hitler articles?

To me, Trump's rhetoric is simply anti-immigration. When I hear Donald Trump, I don't hear the ghost of Hitler, I hear the distant whispers of the Know-Nothings in the 1850's. But let's say I'm wrong, Trump is Hitler. Hitler said kill Immigrants and kill Jews.

That means Donald Trump must be stopped.

That means Rashida Tlaib must be stopped.

Right? Not if you follow the American Press.

If Rashida Tlaib want Jews dead because they are White. How do you think she feels about White Americans?

You see how we can play the rabbit hole game too?

All of this Hitler crap could have been avoided if Rashida Tlaib would have simply said "Israel has a right to exist." Which, again, she will not say.

---

You literally do not care what's going on in the Middle East?

The reason Rashida Tlaib is so dangerous is because if she is successful in redefining what Apartheid is in Israel, she may try the same template right here in America. The United States Senate could potentially fit Tlaib's definition of Apartheid. Now the Senate was set up over 200 years ago so the big states couldn't bully the little states, it was part of the founders' philosophy of a government with checks and balances.

But for the uninformed, Tlaib could try to re-frame the argument as saying that the evil WHITE founders set up the Senate so that low population WHITE states like Utah, Wyoming or Montana would have undue power in the political process over high population MINORITY states like Georgia, Alabama, or California.

[Nevermind that there weren't "White" states or "Black" states in the late 1700's.]

What are you going to do when Rashida Tlaib tries to redefine the Senate into a broader Apartheid definition?