Race-journalist Jamele Hill got into a little hot water for saying this yesterday: “We would all be very naive if we didn’t say race and (Caitlin's Clark) sexuality played a role in her popularity."
Hill's problem with Clark? She thinks that the WNBA is awesome, but the face of the league should be a Black Lesbian.
Free speech advocate Fred Hunt hates the WNBA. Pro and college leagues I would watch before the WNBA?
MLB
College Softball
NHL
College Hockey
PWHL
NFL
College Football
Any European Soccer League
MLS
College Soccer
NWSL
Indoor Soccer
NBA
Premier Lacrosse League
World Cricket
Professional Rugby
Sevens Rugby
Ultimate Frisbee Association
Boxing
MMA/UFC
My problem with Clark? Nothing with Clark personally, I just don't like anything associated with the WNBA.
Now both Jamele Hill and Fred Hunt agree that they could do without Caitlin Clark.
I don't like basketball in general, specifically the WNBA's brand of basketball.
Hill doesn't like Clark's race. Or her sexuality. Or Iowa?
You say I'm an old sour puss? I can't argue with that, but nobody reads this blog.
Jamele Hill hates middle America. Sees racism everywhere, whether it's there or not. And thinks heterosexuality is over-represented.
Your question should be: Why does Hill still have a national platform?
Comments